The cuesports enthusiasts site
Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

7 Pages«<23456>»
8balltiger Offline
#61 Posted : 04 April 2012 16:21:26(UTC)
8balltiger

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 11/08/2003(UTC)
Posts: 1,166
Man
Location: Sheffield and Barnsley.

Thanks: 305 times
Was thanked: 418 time(s) in 273 post(s)
Planner;48522 wrote:

"This is a very simple concept people. This event will take place, the money will be guaranteed, and all are welcome to participate. If you allow others to dictate your playing careers that is your choice, but this event offers players who wish to play pool without restrictions that option."



I'm afraid this event could be far more restrictive to any player than the EPA , if the WEPF / EPA regard this as a rebel and ban-worthy event , then I would miss out on Interleague , County etcetera from my Association of choice , whereas On-Q have nothing else to enter.

S U F C
Colesy Offline
#62 Posted : 04 April 2012 17:54:47(UTC)
Colesy

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Wimbledon Comp, Registered
Joined: 17/10/2003(UTC)
Posts: 1,933
Man
Location: Devon

Thanks: 334 times
Was thanked: 320 time(s) in 201 post(s)
Originally Posted by: ddavis Go to Quoted Post
Bound to be a bit of discussion about this one...

http://www.ipapooltour.c...-festival-2012-launched/


Was you aware that the page that this links to doesn't actually mention which rules these events will be played to?

Confused
creggan Offline
#63 Posted : 04 April 2012 20:08:42(UTC)
creggan

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 06/05/2008(UTC)
Posts: 898
Man
Location: United Kingdom

Thanks: 211 times
Was thanked: 101 time(s) in 78 post(s)
Just curious as to how On-Q came to the decision to play this competition to BB.
PS
I am not a player who would be entering anything like this & usually play WR and have never entered any WR worlds qualifiers.
theflyingscotsman Offline
#64 Posted : 04 April 2012 21:10:28(UTC)
theflyingscotsman

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 29/08/2005(UTC)
Posts: 550

Thanks: 33 times
Was thanked: 183 time(s) in 107 post(s)
I think if you look at what I said in another post, you will see that real players from all over the World will try and qualify for this event.

Not players saying that they play in this country or that country, players WHO DO play in those countries will be asked to qualify from their governing bodies, not made up to fool sponsors.

One other thing BB rules as they stand are easy to learn, easy to watch and are not as negative as WRs.

That is my opinion way On Q Promotions have selected BB and also it is the future of the game.

Edited by user 04 April 2012 21:11:08(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

 1 user thanked theflyingscotsman for this useful post.
Mr_O on 05/04/2012(UTC)
Mr_O Offline
#65 Posted : 05 April 2012 00:31:02(UTC)
Mr_O

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 03/09/2010(UTC)
Posts: 177
Location: Wales

Thanks: 10 times
Was thanked: 11 time(s) in 10 post(s)
Be good if everyone could do their bit to get grass roots & semi-serious players watching the event on Sky. If it's just a few text messages it could double the viewing figures. Surely most people who enjoy playing pool would at least give it a chance, considering some of the other mundane sports people watch.
Good move switching to Blackball for sure
lancashireoatcake Offline
#66 Posted : 05 April 2012 12:11:46(UTC)
lancashireoatcake

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 22/08/2006(UTC)
Posts: 1,178
Man
Location: Staffordshire

Thanks: 234 times
Was thanked: 334 time(s) in 218 post(s)
A few things I'd like to put as my opinion on things. I'm not going to suggest these as complete truths, but it's my opinion and you can see the logic behind it.

Why have ON-Q requested that this be played to BB rules?

To me it could be a number of reasons, possibly because they are a World Snooker Centre, and as The WPBSA comes under the WPA umberella, they may have thought it more sensible to play by the rules as set out by them. Or it might just be that they are a promotions company, and World Rules are so alien to the vast majority of people that trying to explain them to a viewers that do not know them would be a complete nightmare. However it might be easy enough to make a 2 minute clip going through the BB Rules, or even just explaining them as they go along is far easier than trying to explain why a game has landed itself in stalemate at WR. Oh and the fact that they are more exciting and they want people to watch.

Why call it On-Q when the IPA are behind it?

This is something of a sticky issue here... you guys might well claim this to be the case, but there are legalities involved that make it nigh on impossible for the EPA to ban people because of their involvement in a Profit based Company's tournament. They would need a very good legal team to convince that this particular restraint on trade was just, in my opinion. Much easier for them to ban something that is run by the IPA. You miss the point here that the IPA have simply made it clear that they are more than welcome to attend this championships as professionals, the WEPF do not hold a World Professional Championships, neither do they recognise On-Q as a Governing Body and so they have no legal grounds on which they could restrict their players from going into this event.

Will the EPA ban Players because this is being played to Blackball Rules?

No. The rules don't matter. EPA have Blackball leagues affiliated to them, Keith Brewer plays on a blackball tour that is run privately. If it was by EBPF then yes, sure, they would be banned.

Will the likes of Kendall, Brewer, Tomms, Burgess etc be allowed to play in this tournament?

Yes, they would be welcomed with open arms, as this tournament is avertised as unrelated to any body / politics free. Nobody would be refused entry, but looking at it they would need to be professionals, and seeing as though non of them are they would have to qualify by winning a qualifier. I would suggest that perhaps you can be a nominated club professional if you win that particular clubs qualifier.

Again, just my thoughts

:-D
My opinion should just be accepted as objectivity itself.
loquacious Offline
#67 Posted : 05 April 2012 12:47:10(UTC)
loquacious

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 02/04/2002(UTC)
Posts: 668

Thanks: 10 times
Was thanked: 178 time(s) in 108 post(s)
Why have ON-Q requested that this be played to BB rules?

I believe it's prob a numbers game, they will have most of the w/r players from the I.P.A tour attending, if it was played to WR that's prob as far as it would go concerning numbers, due to the bans which will be dished out!

Also can't see many of the George tour being allowed or turning up.
But lob in the BB rules and you then have a different animal on the amount of people that can and will attend.
breenmachine Offline
#68 Posted : 05 April 2012 12:47:44(UTC)
breenmachine

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 18/07/2001(UTC)
Posts: 533

Thanks: 71 times
Was thanked: 261 time(s) in 163 post(s)
Originally Posted by: lancashireoatcake Go to Quoted Post


Why call it On-Q when the IPA are behind it?

This is something of a sticky issue here... you guys might well claim this to be the case, but there are legalities involved that make it nigh on impossible for the EPA to ban people because of their involvement in a Profit based Company's tournament. They would need a very good legal team to convince that this particular restraint on trade was just, in my opinion. Much easier for them to ban something that is run by the IPA. You miss the point here that the IPA have simply made it clear that they are more than welcome to attend this championships as professionals, the WEPF do not hold a World Professional Championships, neither do they recognise On-Q as a Governing Body and so they have no legal grounds on which they could restrict their players from going into this event.

Will the EPA ban Players because this is being played to Blackball Rules?

No. The rules don't matter. EPA have Blackball leagues affiliated to them, Keith Brewer plays on a blackball tour that is run privately. If it was by EBPF then yes, sure, they would be banned.



I do understand that Dan but I just dont think the 'legalities' of it will make any difference. If you join the EPA you agree to not participate in any event that is in direct competition with them, if they choose to see this event as in direct competition (as a WC and the EPA as part of the WEPF) then I dont think whether it is a governing body or not will make any difference. Your not banned as such, just not allowed to be a member of the EPA as you dont agree to their rules.

The EPA may say if you want to enter you are no longer a member of our association, and whilst they may be taken to court and found that this is something they are unable to do, will you convince amateurs who want to play interleague etc to enter when they may be 'banned' and IF this ban is overturned because its illegal it could take years to sort out?


breenmachine Offline
#69 Posted : 05 April 2012 12:54:41(UTC)
breenmachine

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 18/07/2001(UTC)
Posts: 533

Thanks: 71 times
Was thanked: 261 time(s) in 163 post(s)
Originally Posted by: loquacious Go to Quoted Post
Why have ON-Q requested that this be played to BB rules?

I believe it's prob a numbers game, they will have most of the w/r players from the I.P.A tour attending, if it was played to WR that's prob as far as it would go concerning numbers, due to the bans which will be dished out!

Also can't see many of the George tour being allowed or turning up.
But lob in the BB rules and you then have a different animal on the amount of people that can and will attend.



That makes perfect sense.
loquacious Offline
#70 Posted : 05 April 2012 12:57:43(UTC)
loquacious

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 02/04/2002(UTC)
Posts: 668

Thanks: 10 times
Was thanked: 178 time(s) in 108 post(s)
Lancs wrote...... neither do they recognise On-Q as a Governing Body and so they have no legal grounds on which they could restrict their players from going into this event.

Makes no difference as far as George is concerned!

Not so long ago,Me and Ross alongside Bron and The Bushman,ran some guaranteed 10 grand events, we were running them off our own backs as private promoters, George told his IPA players Mick Hill, Ronan and Rob Chilton to name a few, that they were not allowed to enter and if they did they would prob incur a ban.
 1 user thanked loquacious for this useful post.
breenmachine on 05/04/2012(UTC)
lancashireoatcake Offline
#71 Posted : 05 April 2012 13:25:46(UTC)
lancashireoatcake

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 22/08/2006(UTC)
Posts: 1,178
Man
Location: Staffordshire

Thanks: 234 times
Was thanked: 334 time(s) in 218 post(s)
Don't disagree with anything any of you have written.

I would say though that none of the people that have been banned before have not considered taking action against EPA / WEPF.

A mark like this against the EPA, would certainly make the Sports Council sit up and listen too.

As things stand, the only people that are making noises about bans etc are the people on this forum... There is no reason why the EPA would ban their own members for entering a privately run tournament. Surely they would have to advise their membership beforehand if they were going to take action.

Or is Marty McFly and Doc Emmet Brown now part of the Executive? lol

2 years before Hoverboards come out... cannot wait.
My opinion should just be accepted as objectivity itself.
The_Red_Monkey Offline
#72 Posted : 05 April 2012 13:30:21(UTC)
The_Red_Monkey

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 03/02/2007(UTC)
Posts: 110

Thanks: 2 times
Was thanked: 14 time(s) in 12 post(s)
I don't think it is scare tactics but some are scared of retrospective action.
Instead of speculating perhaps someone should contact the EPA and get an official
stance.

Good to see another event and a company that has an interest in progress. Good luck
to everyone involved.
breenmachine Offline
#73 Posted : 05 April 2012 13:55:38(UTC)
breenmachine

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 18/07/2001(UTC)
Posts: 533

Thanks: 71 times
Was thanked: 261 time(s) in 163 post(s)
Originally Posted by: lancashireoatcake Go to Quoted Post
Don't disagree with anything any of you have written.

I would say though that none of the people that have been banned before have not considered taking action against EPA / WEPF.

A mark like this against the EPA, would certainly make the Sports Council sit up and listen too.

As things stand, the only people that are making noises about bans etc are the people on this forum... There is no reason why the EPA would ban their own members for entering a privately run tournament. Surely they would have to advise their membership beforehand if they were going to take action.

Or is Marty McFly and Doc Emmet Brown now part of the Executive? lol

2 years before Hoverboards come out... cannot wait.



Fair points Dan, The EPA may not even consider banning players for entering this. I just think the point that 'onQ is not a governing body and therefore the EPA cant ban players' is too simplistic and not even true, especially in respect of previous scenarios as Pat has shed light on. If they wish to then they will unfortunately, and players should be aware of that rather than saying 'of course they cant ban you, we arent a governing body'.
lancashireoatcake Offline
#74 Posted : 05 April 2012 14:40:08(UTC)
lancashireoatcake

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 22/08/2006(UTC)
Posts: 1,178
Man
Location: Staffordshire

Thanks: 234 times
Was thanked: 334 time(s) in 218 post(s)
Originally Posted by: breenmachine Go to Quoted Post
Originally Posted by: lancashireoatcake Go to Quoted Post
Don't disagree with anything any of you have written.

I would say though that none of the people that have been banned before have not considered taking action against EPA / WEPF.

A mark like this against the EPA, would certainly make the Sports Council sit up and listen too.

As things stand, the only people that are making noises about bans etc are the people on this forum... There is no reason why the EPA would ban their own members for entering a privately run tournament. Surely they would have to advise their membership beforehand if they were going to take action.

Or is Marty McFly and Doc Emmet Brown now part of the Executive? lol

2 years before Hoverboards come out... cannot wait.



Fair points Dan, The EPA may not even consider banning players for entering this. I just think the point that 'onQ is not a governing body and therefore the EPA cant ban players' is too simplistic and not even true, especially in respect of previous scenarios as Pat has shed light on. If they wish to then they will unfortunately, and players should be aware of that rather than saying 'of course they cant ban you, we arent a governing body'.


OK Andy yeah, but on that point about Pat's previous scenarios, might that be referring back to the infamous £3k a man self imposed ban... he did say it was George.

The difference there being that there are specifics within that particular rule (imposed upon themselves for the sake of self preservation), which are clearly defined.

People say that the EPA rule is vague, but I don't particularly think it is.

I understand that should I play in or administer a pool event organised in direct competition with the English Pool Association (EPA), then this registration may be suspended. Events to which this condition has already been determined to apply are ones not organised by the EPA, or a County Association affiliated to it where the players purport to represent England or an English county.

Nobody from On-Q is purporting to represent England or a County within England. I don't believe it to be in Direct Competition to the WEPF World Championships... in fact I'm sure that there will be people who will attend both.

The EPA stand to benefit massively if the IPA do manage to get to a level where they are regularly on our screens as more casual players look to emulate them... Much like the BDO has benefited massively from the success if the PDC. Inevitably the first steps toward this will be playing county / interleague. I just would really like to see the EPA do the right thing and start a genuine amateur tour in clubs up and down the country. Giving some much needed business to the Clubs that have supported them over the years.

Shy of all the politics... This has the potential to be a huge huge event. I'd love to see the ON-Q speak to local hotels and arrange some REAL special rates for this event so that before qualifiers start, players will know what extra expense there will be should they be successful and qualify.

Maybe speak to some local caterers and get some great food done at the venue to keep people there as opposed to them all going out. Indian restaurants will give you a special menu which will include a comission for the venue and still give discount. Just maximise the business potential behind each opportunity whilst ensuring the customer (players) are feeling the benefit of the economies of scale.
My opinion should just be accepted as objectivity itself.
breenmachine Offline
#75 Posted : 05 April 2012 14:53:29(UTC)
breenmachine

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 18/07/2001(UTC)
Posts: 533

Thanks: 71 times
Was thanked: 261 time(s) in 163 post(s)
Originally Posted by: lancashireoatcake Go to Quoted Post
Originally Posted by: breenmachine Go to Quoted Post
Originally Posted by: lancashireoatcake Go to Quoted Post
Don't disagree with anything any of you have written.

I would say though that none of the people that have been banned before have not considered taking action against EPA / WEPF.

A mark like this against the EPA, would certainly make the Sports Council sit up and listen too.

As things stand, the only people that are making noises about bans etc are the people on this forum... There is no reason why the EPA would ban their own members for entering a privately run tournament. Surely they would have to advise their membership beforehand if they were going to take action.

Or is Marty McFly and Doc Emmet Brown now part of the Executive? lol

2 years before Hoverboards come out... cannot wait.



Fair points Dan, The EPA may not even consider banning players for entering this. I just think the point that 'onQ is not a governing body and therefore the EPA cant ban players' is too simplistic and not even true, especially in respect of previous scenarios as Pat has shed light on. If they wish to then they will unfortunately, and players should be aware of that rather than saying 'of course they cant ban you, we arent a governing body'.



People say that the EPA rule is vague, but I don't particularly think it is.

I understand that should I play in or administer a pool event organised in direct competition with the English Pool Association (EPA), then this registration may be suspended. Events to which this condition has already been determined to apply are ones not organised by the EPA, or a County Association affiliated to it where the players purport to represent England or an English county.

Nobody from On-Q is purporting to represent England or a County within England. I don't believe it to be in Direct Competition to the WEPF World Championships... in fact I'm sure that there will be people who will attend both.



I think I read this section of the rules a little different to you Dan.

I read it as if your representing a county or England then the EPA have already decided that this is in direct competition, this does not mean everything else is excluded, just means they havnt made a decision on individual lists yet.

I agree with everything else you have written.
creggan Offline
#76 Posted : 05 April 2012 15:04:37(UTC)
creggan

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 06/05/2008(UTC)
Posts: 898
Man
Location: United Kingdom

Thanks: 211 times
Was thanked: 101 time(s) in 78 post(s)
Quote:
I understand that should I play in or administer a pool event organised in direct competition with the English Pool Association (EPA), then this registration may be suspended. Events to which this condition has already been determined to apply are ones not organised by the EPA, or a County Association affiliated to it where the players purport to represent England or an English county.

Just a thought if English players play in this new "world championships" which country will they be said to be representing ?
lancashireoatcake Offline
#77 Posted : 05 April 2012 15:16:42(UTC)
lancashireoatcake

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 22/08/2006(UTC)
Posts: 1,178
Man
Location: Staffordshire

Thanks: 234 times
Was thanked: 334 time(s) in 218 post(s)
Sorry yes Agree with you Andy.

But I also think that they cannot deem this to be set up to be in Direct competition with EPA because this particular tournament has never been done before by them or the WEPF.

It may well transpire that neither of the tournaments are deemed a success (despite what the organisers will report!), but fair play to everyone at On-Q promotions for taking the steps to quash any concerns that IPA players may have had about the WEPF Worlds becoming an amateur only event. Especially after how they were treated by the EPA / WEPF with the Masters.

Now, should the WEPF / EPA take the decision to ban all professionals from the WEPF Championships in Blackpool, they still have the chance to call themselves the World Professional Champion, and Pick up £10k and coverage on Sky for the measly sum of £125. Can't be bad.

The WEPF World Champ will frankly be a laughing stock unless they put Amateur somewhere in the Title. Again, much like the BDO champ wouldn't be fit to lick the piss off Taylor / Lewis / Wade's shoe.
My opinion should just be accepted as objectivity itself.
8balltiger Offline
#78 Posted : 05 April 2012 15:23:02(UTC)
8balltiger

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 11/08/2003(UTC)
Posts: 1,166
Man
Location: Sheffield and Barnsley.

Thanks: 305 times
Was thanked: 418 time(s) in 273 post(s)
I doubt the EPA will ignore the input of Moray / IPA/ CCI and the fact that its claiming to be a World Championships.
S U F C
 1 user thanked 8balltiger for this useful post.
breenmachine on 05/04/2012(UTC)
lancashireoatcake Offline
#79 Posted : 05 April 2012 15:34:18(UTC)
lancashireoatcake

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 22/08/2006(UTC)
Posts: 1,178
Man
Location: Staffordshire

Thanks: 234 times
Was thanked: 334 time(s) in 218 post(s)
Originally Posted by: creggan Go to Quoted Post
Quote:
I understand that should I play in or administer a pool event organised in direct competition with the English Pool Association (EPA), then this registration may be suspended. Events to which this condition has already been determined to apply are ones not organised by the EPA, or a County Association affiliated to it where the players purport to represent England or an English county.

Just a thought if English players play in this new "world championships" which country will they be said to be representing ?



They wouldn't be representing any particular country Creggan. It would be more likely that they would be representing a professsional Body.

So for example, Potts would represent IPA, McInnes would represent PPPO, Kendall might represent Players, I could represent Rileys (if I won a qualifier), Shaw would represent SPA, Matthews represent SEPF, Burgess represent PFW, Marsh represent WPA.

It doesn't matter really. I would assume though that the only criteria necessary would be that if you were not coming from a professional body, you might need to qualify through as a Club pro.

Alternatively if a country association doesn't have a professional body, then they could name them elite players and grant them permission to attend as that country's professionals.

Lambert could represent FFB, Shaw would represent SPA, Matthews represent SEPF, Burgess represent PFW, Marsh represent WPA, Coldrick could represent AFEBAS, South Africa Pros, Australia Pros, Spanish pros, Catalan pros (let's not go there gentlemen), Malta Pros, Shetland Isles Pros (yes yes yes I know)... Nobody from IPA has to represent England though.

My opinion should just be accepted as objectivity itself.
juan-king Offline
#80 Posted : 05 April 2012 15:41:11(UTC)
juan-king

Rank: Administration

Groups: Registered, Moderators, Administrators
Joined: 06/04/2003(UTC)
Posts: 3,441
Man
Location: The Priory

Thanks: 772 times
Was thanked: 717 time(s) in 517 post(s)
Originally Posted by: creggan Go to Quoted Post
Quote:
I understand that should I play in or administer a pool event organised in direct competition with the English Pool Association (EPA), then this registration may be suspended. Events to which this condition has already been determined to apply are ones not organised by the EPA, or a County Association affiliated to it where the players purport to represent England or an English county.

Just a thought if English players play in this new "world championships" which country will they be said to be representing ?


I'll be representing Cape Verde (Leicester Branch).

 1 user thanked juan-king for this useful post.
Rich Wharton on 07/04/2012(UTC)
Users browsing this topic
Guest
7 Pages«<23456>»
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Powered by YAF | YAF © 2003-2013, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.528 seconds.
 

Partners

Golden 8 Ball

Translate

copyright © cueclubinternational.com